Reply To: Scripts 2013

Forums Herbalist Scripts Scripts 2013 Reply To: Scripts 2013

#2677
AvatarEK
Keymaster

    Bill 113 –signed By Mayor of Hawaii-GMO Free Zone
     
    William P. Kenoi -Mayor
     
    Walter K.M. Lau -Managing Director
     
    Randall M. Kurohara -Deputy Managing Director
     
    County of Hawaii–Office of the Mayor
     
    25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 • Hilo, Hawai’i 96720 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553 KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy., Bldg. C • Kailua-Kona, Hawai’i 96740
    (808) 323-4444 • Fax (808) 323-4440
     
    December 5, 2013
     
    J Yoshimoto, Chair
     
    And Members ofthe Hawai ‘i County Council
    25 Aupuni Street
    Hilo, Hawai’i 96720
     
    Aloha, Chair Yoshimoto and Members:
     
    On Nov. 19, 2013 the Hawai’i County Council adopted Bill 113 Draft 3 adding anew article relating to Genetically Engineered Crops and Plants, and on Nov. 21, 2013 delivered the bill to me for my consideration. After careful deliberation and discussions with members ofmy administration and the public, I am signing Bill I I 3. Our community has a deep connection and respect for our land, and we all understand we must protect our island and preserve our precious natural resources. We are determined to do what is right for the land because this place is unlike any other in the world. With this new ordinance we are conveying that instead of global agribusiness corporations, we want to encourage and support community-based fanning and ranching.
     
    The debate over this bill has at times been divisive and hurtful, and some of our hard-working farmers who produce food for our community have been treated disrespectfully. We are determined to protect every farmer and rancher. Agriculture on Hawai’i Island will continue to grow with county assistance, investment and support. That commitment includes initiatives such as the public-private partnership to improve and expand the Pa’auilo Slaughterhouse to support our grass-fed beef industry, and the launch of the Kapulena Agricultural Park, the largest agricultural park in the state on 1,739 acres of county-owned land. It also includes support for innovative training programs to grow the fanners of the future, and to train veterans to engage in agriculture on Hawaiian Home Lands, and the introduction and advancement ofKorea11 Natural Farming as a sustainable method ofproducing healthier crops and livestock. It includes completion ofthe first-in-the-state Food Self-Sufficiency Baseline Study ofHawai’i Island to
    measure the island’s progress toward food self-sufficiency. County ofHawai’ i is an Equal Oppotnmity Provider and Employer. J Yoshimoto, Chair, And Members of the Hawaii County Council
     
    We are determined to reunite our farming community to create a stronger and more vibrant agricultural sector. It is time to end the angry rhetoric and reach out to our neighbors. Our farmers are essential to creating a wholesome and sustainable food supply on this island, and they deserve to be treated with respect and aloha. We must tum now to a meaningful, factual dialogue with one another. With my approval ofthis bill, our administration will launch a year ofresearch and data collection to investigate factual claims and to seek out new directions that farming in our community should take. This work will include an expanded database detailing the locations of both organic and conventional farms, the crops that are grown, more accurate estimates of the revenue earned from these enterprises, and the challenges our farmers face in meeting food
    safety and organic certification requirements. We will work with our farmers and our ranchers to carefully monitor the impacts of this bill over the next year to separate speculation and guesswork from the facts.
     
    Today our communities expect that government will be as cautious as possible in protecting our food and water supplies. We all want to minimize impacts to the environment while also producing abundant, affordable food for local consumption. This ordinance expresses the desires and demands ofour community for a safe, sustainable agricultural sector that can help feed our people while keeping our precious island productive and healthy.
     
    Aloha,
     
    William P. Kenoi —MAYOR
     
    **********************************************************************
     
    Seed Industry structure–GMO
     
     
     
    ************************************************************************************************
     
    Specific plasma lipid classes and phospholipid fatty acids indicative of dairy food consumption associate with insulin sensitivity
    + Author Affiliations—-1From the Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia (PJN, NS, NAM, GW, CKB, MTG, and PJM), and Metabolomics Australia, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (DPDS and DLT).
    + Author Notes——↵2 Supported by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (PJM), the Heart Foundation of Australia (NS and MTG), the OIS Program of the Victorian Government, Australia, and in part by the Dairy Health and Nutrition Consortium, Australia (Bega Cheese/Tatura Milk Industries, Fonterra Australia, Lion Dairy and Drinks, Murray Goulburn Co-operative, Parmalat Australia, Warrnambool Cheese and Butter, Geoffrey Gardiner Foundation, Dairy Australia, and Dairy Innovation Australia).
    · ↵3 Address correspondence to PJ Nestel, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, PO Box 6492, St Kilda Road Central, Melbourne 8008, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
    Abstract
    Background: Reports have suggested that the consumption of dairy foods may reduce risk of type 2 diabetes on the basis of evidence of raised circulating ruminant fatty acids.
    Objective: We determined whether certain phospholipid species and fatty acids that are associated with full-fat dairy consumption may also be linked to diminished insulin resistance.
    Design: Four variables of insulin resistance and sensitivity were defined from oral-glucose-tolerance tests in 86 overweight and obese subjects with metabolic syndrome. Plasma phospholipids, sphingolipids, and fatty acids were determined by using a lipidomic analysis and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to provide objective markers of dairy consumption. Food records provided information on dairy products. Associations were determined by using linear regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders age, sex, systolic blood pressure, waist:hip ratio, or body mass index (BMI) and corrected for multiple comparisons.
    Results: Lysophosphatidylcholine, lyso-platelet-activating factor, and several phospholipid fatty acids correlated directly with the number of servings of full-fat dairy foods. Lysophosphatidylcholine and lyso-platelet-activating factor were also associated directly with insulin sensitivity when accounting for the waist:hip ratio (Matsuda index unadjusted, P < 0.001 for both; adjusted for multiple comparisons, P < 0.02 for both) and inversely with insulin resistance (fasting insulin unadjusted, P < 0.001 for both; adjusted, P = 0.04 and P < 0.05, respectively; homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance adjusted, P = 0.04 for both; post–glucose insulin area under the plasma insulin curve during the 120 min of the test adjusted, P < 0.01 for both). The substitution of BMI for the waist:hip ratio attenuated associations modestly. Phospholipid fatty acid 17:0 also tended to be associated directly with insulin sensitivity and inversely with resistance.
    Conclusion: Variables of insulin resistance were lower at higher concentrations of specific plasma phospholipids that were also indicators of full-fat dairy consumption. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00163943.
    *************************************************************************
    Trans Fat “Ban” Not What It Appears
    It may actually be a way to promote a Monsanto GMO product. Action Alert!–You may have already heard the news: the FDA has banned trans fats! Well, sort of.–Under the FDA’s proposed rule, trans fat itself is not banned. Instead, the ban is on the major source of trans fats in processed food—partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs). PHOs are artificial trans fats, created via the process of adding hydrogen to vegetable oils in order to make them semi-solid. Naturally occurring trans fat is found in some meat and dairy including beef, lamb and, in small amounts, butter. Many margarines, on the other hand, are made with PHOs and therefore contain high levels of artificial trans fats. Increasingly, margarines are switching to palm oils (which are semi-solid at room temperature and solid if refrigerated) to eliminate PHOs.–It’s important to note that since this is a proposed rule, and not a final one, there’s still a chance it could be changed or dropped. In the rule, the FDA mentions that the agency is open to alternate approaches to addressing PHOs in food, such as the setting of acceptable trans fat threshold levels.—The timing and intent of the FDA’s rule is suspect for two reasons. First, it was announced only after most companies had already eliminated trans fat—it’s currently only in a handful of foods. Second, the ban will promote market demand for two new GMO soybeans by Monsanto and DuPont, which are engineered for trans fat free oils.—Essentially, the FDA released the PHO ban at a politically perfect point: when it would no longer anger Big Food, but would be of tremendous benefit to Big Biotech’s and Big Food’s newly deregulated products.
    Here’s the timeline:
    January 2006: The FDA mandates labeling for foods containing trans fat. There is, however, a loophole that allows foods containing fewer than 0.5 grams of trans fat per serving to claim “zero trans fat.”
    2007 to 2011: By 2011, trans fat is reduced or eliminated in 66% of the most common processed supermarket products. Essentially, the “war” on trans fat in processed food is over.
    · January 2011: The FDA signs off on a “safety assessment” on Monsanto’s Vistive Gold soybean (aka MON 87705)—based, of course, on studies submitted by Monsanto.
    December 2011: The USDA deregulates the Vistive Gold soybean, meaning it can be planted anywhere without restrictions.
    November 2013: The FDA issues its proposed ban on trans fat.
    Monsanto and DuPont’s soybeans and the oils derived from them (DuPont makes a competing product called Plenish High Oleic Soybean Oil) are meant to appeal to consumers by giving them a “healthy” veneer since they are trans fat free. This is only the beginning: increasingly biotech companies are marketing products that are positioned to benefit consumers’ health but actually contain GMOs. (Read more about it in our article on the subject).–This move ignores the fact that since many processed foods and most whole foods are already free of trans fats, the new GMO soybeans are a superfluous “innovation.” The biotech giants also fail to tell the public that conventional soybean oil, due both to its overuse in American foods and the way it is created, can be incredibly unhealthy.–For the past five or six decades, soybean oil—which is composed of 35% to 55% omega 6 fats—has been the leading fat in processed food: the average American consumes 10% of their total daily calories from soybean oil.[F1] The overconsumption of soybean oil is one of the contributing factors to the average American’s imbalance of omega 3 and omega 6 fats. Additionally, the way nonorganic soybean oil—hydrogenated or not—is produced is inherently toxic:
    Soybean, canola, corn, sunflower, and cottonseed oils are processed with hexane, a known neurotoxin. It’s the same substance that’s used to make gasoline.
    It’s likely that trace amounts of hexane remains in final oil, yet the FDA does not require testing and has not set a maximum residue level for hexane.
    Soybean oil is also treated with sodium hydroxide and phosphoric acid; it’s then bleached with hydrochloric acid, which removes all vitamin A from the oil.
    The “deodorizing” process (in its natural state, soybean oil can be smelly) strips the oil of vitamin E and phytosterols, completing its transition to “nutritionally void.”
    In light of its likely political motivations—and despite the rapturous announcement in the mainstream media—we find little to praise in the FDA’s PHO ban.
    ****************************************************************************
    Natural Gene Therapy for Precision and Safety
    Spontaneous reversions of inherited disease mutations point the way to new
    approaches in gene therapy. Dr Mae-Wan Ho–Another example of natural versus artificial genetic modification
    Natural gene therapy is the ability of cells in individuals with hereditary disease to back mutate the gene (s) involved to regain lost biological function, thereby ameliorating the disease. This remarkable phenomenon is receiving increasing attention, thanks to cell sorting and DNA sequencing techniques that enable researchers to detect and analyse even rare populations of mutant cells. It is another example of the precise natural genetic modification that cells and organisms carry out on a routine basis in order to better survive. In a recent review article, “The new genetics and natural versus artificial genetic modification” [1], I contrasted the precision of natural process with the crude, artificial counterpart that inevitably damages the genome and interferes with natural genetic modification. That incidentally also explains
    [2] Why GMOs Can Never be Safe (SiS 59). Among the most exquisite examples of natural genetic modification is the ability of cells and organisms to activate or mutate just the right genes in order to overcome an obstacle to growth [3] (Non-Random Directed Mutations Confirmed, SiS 60). In microorganisms, such non-random mutations are obviously adaptive; though not so in multicellular organisms in which cells acquiring a mutation to multiply may mean cancer. But there are situations where such apparently non-random mutations can benefit the organism as a whole, and natural gene therapy is one of them. Somatic mosaics and spontaneous reversions of inherited disease mutations
    It has long been assumed that except for lymphocytes in the blood, which undergo genetic rearrangements and hypermutations to generate antibodies and other proteins of the immune system, all cells in the body carry the same genome. And even lymphocytes with genetic rearrangements in the immunoglubulins should have the same gene sequences in the constant subunits of those proteins and in any other gene in the genome. However, as researchers are discovering to their surprise that most individuals are genetically multiple personalities; they have populations of somatic cells with different genomes, a condition known as somatic mosaicism. Of particular interest are those resulting from reversion to normal of disease mutations inherited from their parents [4-6]. Mosaicisms resulting from reversion to normal of an inherited mutation were discovered because of milder than expected clinical course and/or the presence of both phenotypically normal and abnormal cells in vivo and in vitro. To-date, diseases for which spontaneous reversions have been identified include tyrosinaemia type 1, X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID), autosomal adenine deaminase (ADA) SCID, Wiskoff-Aldrich syndrome, Bloom’s syndrome, epidemolysis bullosa, Fanconi anaemia, X-linked ectodermal dysplasia and immunodeficiency, leucocyte adhesion deficiency type 1 [6], Duchenne muscular dystrophy [7], Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A [8], and Lesch Nyhan syndrome [9].[F2]—There are no systematic data [F3]on the prevalence of spontaneous reversions, but one suspects they may be more common than reported so far, and involving a wider range of inherited diseases. Spontaneous revertant lymphocytes are found in 20 % of Bloom syndrome patients [4, 5], up to a level of 75 %. In hereditary tyrosinemia type (IHT1), a severe disease affecting primarily the liver, reversion was observed in 88 % of patients; with reverted surfaces of the liver ranging from 0.1 % to 85 % [10]. And more than 1/3 of patients with epidemolysis bullosa, a condition involving blistering of the skin, have revertant skin patches [11]. We shall look at some examples before considering whether they are non-random directed mutations. X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) The latest report of natural gene therapy occurred in a boy suffering from X- SCID caused by mutations in the gene IL2RG coding for the gamma immunoglobulin chain (gc)common to the receptors for several cytokines (signalling molecules secreted by cells of the immune system): interleukin (IL)- 2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15 and IL-21, which signal T and NK cell to multiply. Mutations in the gene
    abolish the function of all of these receptors, resulting in the absence or
    diminished numbers of T (thymus) and NK (natural killer) cells critical to the
    innate immune system; while B cells that secrete antibodies into the blood
    stream are normal. Consequently, afflicted individuals often have infections
    very early in life, and usually die two years after birth.—The boy was diagnosed at 6 years of age, with normal lymphocyte counts, but suffered from recurrent pneumonia and mollusca contagiosa (viral infection affecting the skin) [10]. As proliferative response of T cells and NK cells to the gc interleukins was poor, the researchers analysed the gene IL2RG. This turned up two forms of the gene despite the fact that there was only one X chromosome (as is normal for males); one of which had reverted to normal. The normal version predominated in both naïve and mature CD8+ T cells, which increased over time. A fraction of gd+T cells (subpopulation of T cells abundant in gut mucosa) and differentiated effector memory T cells carried the reversion, while NK or B cells repeatedly tested negative. The patient has steadily improved over the past 7 years since diagnosis, only suffering once from an atypical pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumonia; and after several years, his molluscum contagiosum started to disappear spontaneously as well.
    ****************************************************************************
    Gastrointestinal Hormones and Peptides
    There are more than 30 peptides currently identified as being expressed within the digestive tract, making the gut the largest endocrine organ in the body. The regulatory peptides synthesized by the gut include hormones, peptide neurotransmitters and growth factors. Indeed, several hormones and neurotransmitters first identified in the central nervous system and other endocrine organs have subsequently been found in endocrine cells and/or neurons of the gut. Visit the Peptide Hormones page to see a more complete list of gastrointestinal peptides and hormones and their modes of action. The following discussion will focus on the gut peptides with the best demonstrated roles in the control of appetite and feeding behavior via their interactions with signals produced in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis.
    Hormone
    Location
    Major Action
    Cholecystokinin (CCK)
    enteroendocrine I cells predominantly in the duodenum, jejunum
    stimulates gallbladder contraction and bile flow, increases secretion of digestive enzymes from pancreas, vagal nerves in the gut express CCK1 receptors
    Enterostain
    derived from N-terminal end of pancreatic colipase; pentapeptide existing in three forms: APGPR, VPDPR, and VPGPR
    regulates fat intake, peripheral or central administration inhibits consumption of a high-fat diet but not a low-fat diet
    Ghrelin
    primary site is X/A-like enteroendocrine cells of the stomach oxyntic (acid secreting) glands, minor synthesis in intestine, pancreas and hypothalamus
    regulation of appetite (increases desire for food intake), energy homeostasis, glucose metabolism, gastric secretion and emptying, insulin secretion
    Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)
    enteroendocrine L cells predominantly in the ileum and colon
    potentiates glucose-dependent insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon secretion, inhibits gastric emptying
    Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), originally called gastric inhibitory polypeptide
    enteroendocrine K cells of the duodenum and proximal jejunum
    inhibits secretion of gastric acid, enhances insulin secretion
    Obestatin
    primary site is stomach, minor synthesis in intestine
    derived from pro-ghrelin protein, acts in opposition to ghrelin action on appetite
    Oxyntomodulin
    enteroendocrine L cells predominantly in the ileum and colon
    contains all of the amino acids of glucagon (see Figure below); inhibits meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion similar to GLP-1 and GLP-2 action; induces satiety, decreases weight gain, and increases energy consumption; has weak affinity for GLP-1 receptor as well as glucagon receptor, may mimic glucagon actions in liver and pancreas
    Pancreatic polypeptide: PP
    pancreas
    inhibits pancreatic bicarbonate and protein secretion
    Peptide tyrosine tyrosine: PYY
    enteroendocrine L cells predominantly in the ileum and colon
    reduced gut motility, delays gastric emptying, inhibition of gallbladder contraction, induces satiety via actions in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) of the hypothalamus
    Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)
    pancreas
    smooth muscle relaxation; stimulates pancreatic bicarbonate secretion
     
    ****************************************************************************
    Health Benefits of Pancreatin
     
    Pancreatin (as a source of supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes) possesses the same therapeutic applications as Pancreatic Enzymes.
     
    Digestive System
     
    Pancreatin may improve Digestion.
    Pancreatin may alleviate Pancreatic Insufficiency.
    Pancreatin may alleviate some of the symptoms of Pancreatitis.
     
    Immune System
     
    Pancreatin may reduce Inflammation.
     
    Metabolism
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may help to break down the Fibrin that is implicated in the abnormal Blood Clots that are associated with Thrombosis (due to their constituent Proteolytic Enzymes facilitating the process of fibrinolysis). [more info]
     
    Digestive System
     
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may be a useful treatment for Celiac Disease (many Celiac Disease patients produce insufficient quantities of Pancreatic Enzymes).
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may be a useful treatment for Crohn’s Disease (many Crohn’s Disease patients are deficient in Pancreatic Enzymes).
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may be a useful treatment for Indigestion (many people who suffer from Indigestion produce insufficient quantities of Pancreatic Enzymes).
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may be beneficial for the treatment of Pancreatic Insufficiency (i.e. insufficient endogenous production and secretion of Pancreatic Enzymes).
     
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may be a useful treatment for Pancreatitis.
    Pancreatic Enzymes may help to prevent the proliferation of Intestinal Parasites and Detrimental Microorganisms within the Small Intestine (due to the Proteolytic Enzyme content of Pancreatic Enzymes).
     
    Pancreatin has been used as a means of replacing Pancreatic Enzymes in Cystic Fibrosis patients
     
    Supplementary Pancreatic Enzymes may help to prevent (food) Allergies (by facilitating the digestion of the large molecules that are Antigens in the Foods that cause Food Allergies). references
    Pancreatic Enzymes are one of the groups of Enzymes utilized in Enzyme Therapy (i.e. involving multiple Enzymes, especially Proteolytic Enzymes) to break up (degrade) the Immune Complexes that are theorized to cause various Autoimmune Diseases including: [more info]
     
    – Multiple Sclerosis
    – Rheumatoid Arthritis
     
    Pancreatic Enzymes (especially Proteolytic Enzymes) may help to reduce (acute and chronic) Inflammation. references
    Pancreatic Enzymes (Pancreatin) may help to prevent the proliferation of Intestinal Parasites within the Small Intestine (due to the Proteolytic Enzyme content of Pancreatic Enzymes). —-Pancreatic Enzymes (Pancreatin) help to prevent the proliferation of Detrimental Microorganisms within the Small Intestine (due to the Proteolytic Enzyme content of Pancreatic Enzymes).
    Pancreatic Enzymes may prolong survival and retard tumor growth in Pancreatic Cancer patients. –Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may accelerate the healing of Shingles.
     
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes are often prescribed (even by orthodox medical practitioners) for the treatment of Cystic Fibrosis (they help to normalize the metabolism of Fatty Acids in Cystic Fibrosis patients). references
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may facilitate weight loss in persons afflicted with Obesity (by causing decreased food intake as a result of stimulating endogenous substances that suppress the Appetite). references
     
    Musculoskeletal System
     
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may alleviate the Inflammation associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis. —Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes may alleviate the Inflammation associated with Tendonitis.
     
    Nervous System
     
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes (Pancreatin) may reduce the severity and frequency of symptom flare-ups in Multiple Sclerosis patients.
     
    Novel Usage of Exogenous, Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes
     
    Immune System
     
    Supplemental Pancreatic Enzymes (in large doses) may inhibit the growth of tumors involved in Cancer (it is speculated that Pancreatic Enzymes mortalize otherwise immortal Cells (e.g. Cancer Cells)).
     
     
    TOP
     
     
    [F1]If Not even higher when you figure in all the foods that mention MSG-TVP-HVP- AVP-HPP- Artificial and Natural Flavour-Vege Broths-Vege Oils—and then what the derive out of the soy such as soy lecithin—the level of being corrupted with soy is a lot higher then 10%
    [F2]This is huge this means that out systems can un mutate whatever has been damaged as a result we can reverse the unhealthy back to healthy—
    [F3]Doesn’t mean nothing exist it just means none has been accessible easily located or recorded for everyone to see
    *********************************************************************************************************************************************************
     
    TOP A
    HOME
     
    Show of the Month December 14 2013
     
    Your Children to be Used as Guinea Pigs for New GMO Vaccine
    The benefits of Lugol’s Iodine for the body
    Why should we supplement Lugol’s Iodine Why not just supplement Potassium Iodide(I-) or Nascent Iodine(I3-) instead
    9th Grade Science Project Finds Plants Don’t Grow Near Wi-Fi
     
    **************************************************************************
     
    Your Children to be Used as Guinea Pigs for New GMO Vaccine
    A US vaccine company has applied for permission to infect up to one thousand individuals, including children, with genetically modified live bacteria contained in an oral vaccine. PaxVax recently submitted their application for permission to begin the first of three international clinical trials for the new oral cholera vaccine “via oral ingestion of the GMOs”. [1] –PaxVax claims to have several safeguards in place to “restrict the spread and persistence of the GMOs and their introduced genetic material” during this clinical trial. That precaution itself should lead any parent to question the wisdom of administering genetically modified live bacteria to their child.
    The Problems With GMOs
    Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have earned a great deal of media attention in recent years, and rightfully so.—In a two-year research study in 2010, hamsters were fed GM soy. Most of the third-generation hamsters had lost their ability to have babies. Other disturbing findings from the study included the discovery of hair inside the hamsters’ mouths, slower growth, and a higher mortality rate among offspring. [2]–Numerous other research studies have shown that GMOs pose serious health and environmental risks, including reproductive disorders, immune system disorders, accelerated aging, organ damage, gastrointestinal problems, and cholesterol and insulin problems. [3] The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) recommends that “physicians advise all patients to avoid GM food.” [4]–Although the FDA claimed in 1992 that GMOs are safe, many of their own scientists disagreed with that decision. Dozens of classified government memorandums have since been made public as the result of a lawsuit, showing specific, key objections to the use of GMOs. Unfortunately, the scientists’ recommendations for long-term studies about the safety of GMOs in our food supply were ignored as appointees followed executive orders to claim GMOs were safe. [5]—In over sixty countries, including Japan, Australia, and the entire European Union, complete bans or severe restrictions have been placed on the sale and production of GMO-containing products. [6]–We simply don’t know the long-term effects of introducing genetically modified organisms into our food supply and our bodies. There have been no human clinical trials conducted to evaluate the safety or long-term effects of consuming genetically modified organisms in our food.–The closest thing we have to a clinical trial was dubbed a “human feeding experiment, ” in which published results indicated that “the genetic material inserted into GM soy transfers into bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function.”–In simpler terms, genetically modified proteins may be produced in our bodies continuously after we have have eaten a food containing GMOs.
    The Problems With GM Vaccines
    The problems associated with using GM vaccines are similar to the problems associated with consuming GM foods. Dr. Joseph Mercola, a widely respected health expert, explained these very real concerns using technical language as well as laymen’s terms in a well-written article on his website in 2012. Here is the short answer — or lack thereof — to the questions many parents are facing about the use of GM vaccines–“What happens when foreign DNA is inserted into the human body is a mystery. Will it trigger undesirable changes in human cells or tissues? Will it combine or exchange genetic material with human DNA? Will it transfer to future generations? No one knows.” [7]–Unfortunately, this is not the first time a genetically modified vaccine will be used. A previous version of this vaccine, known then as Orochol, was registered for use as a prescription drug in 2000, under the condition that adverse events would be monitored and reported.
    Back in 1999, the Genetic Manipulation Advisory Committee conducted a risk assessment study of the use of Orochol. Although they claimed that “the vaccine poses no significant risk to the environment or the community,” in their risk assessment, they outlined the potential for multiple risks to health and human safety and the environment:
    “Human health and safety
    Potential hazards that may be posed to human health and safety are whether:
    Orochol® vaccine might be harmful to vaccine recipients; and
    Orochol® vaccine might be harmful to people accidentally exposed to the vaccine.
    Environmental safety
    Potential hazards that may be posed to the safety of the environment are whether:
    GM bacteria might persist in the environment;
    GM bacteria might cause disease in organisms other than humans; and
    GM bacteria might be able to transfer the mercury resistance genes to other microorganisms and harm the environment.” [8]
    Orochol is no longer produced. Effectiveness was estimated at sixty to ninety percent, and its protection lasted a mere three months before a booster vaccine was needed. In some US trials, protection for subjects only lasted a week. In a field trial of more than 67,000 subjects in Indonesia, Orochol did not offer “significant protective efficacy.” [9]–Are the short-lived perceived benefits of using GM vaccines really worth the long-term risks?
    What the Government Isn’t Telling You About GM Vaccines
    If you think that this new cholera vaccine is the only GM vaccine, you are wrong. There are other GM vaccines currently in use or proposed for use in the near future, including at least one flu shot, a vaccine which has come under heavy scrutiny recently for its ineffectiveness.–In January 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a GM vaccine for seasonal influenza outbreaks. This GM flu shot, known as Flublok, is recommended to healthy adults ages 18 – 49 by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) on their website. [10]–However, there are several important facts to consider regarding the use of Flublok which are not mentioned on the page of the CDC’s website that talks about this GM vaccine. The CDC makes no mention of the fact that this flu shot is genetically modified or the fact that its effectiveness is a mere 44 percent, as stated on the Flublok package insert. [11]–Nor does the CDC share the fact that two people died during the clinical trial. -In the section titled “Is this vaccine safe?” the CDC only lists “pain at the injection site, headache, fatigue, and muscle aches” as possible side effects. However, a closer look at the vaccine’s own “Warnings and Precautions” section details the following side effects:
    · allergic reactions
    · respiratory infections
    · headaches
    · fatigue
    · altered immunocompetence
    · rhinorrhea
    · myalgia [12]
    Other Problems With Genetically Modified Vaccines
    According to PaxVax’s application for their proposed clinical trial, “There have been no credible reports of adverse effects on human health and safety or the environment resulting from any of these releases.” That is pharma-speak for “there have been no credible studies to assess the safety and efficacy of this vaccine.”–One facet of this genetically modified vaccine allows the bacteria to grow in the presence of mercury. If traditional bacteria can’t even grow well in mercury, do you think it is healthy for our children to have mercury in their bodies? Do our children need another mercury-laden vaccine?–The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that there are 100,000 – 200,000 deaths worldwide each year from cholera. According to WHO, the “provision of safe water and sanitation is critical in reducing the impact of cholera and other waterborne diseases” and oral cholera vaccines “should not replace conventional control measures.” Malnourished children are also at greater risk for dying from cholera. [13]–Socially responsible measures would dictate that clean water and adequate nutrition should be provided to the most impoverished people in areas where cholera is more widespread, rather than promoting the spread of live, genetically modified cholera bacteria.
    Conclusion
    PaxVax claims to produce “socially responsible vaccines.” Is a vaccine containing genetically modified bacteria really socially responsible?–Is it socially responsible for governments, healthcare providers, and pharmacy technicians to not tell you they are injecting you with a genetically modified vaccine?–If you object to the use of GMOs, or if you are trying to avoid the use of GMOs in your household, you will certainly want to avoid genetically modified vaccines. If you would like to learn more about the vaccine ingredients injected into your child, download our free Vaccine Ingredient Summary now.
    References
    http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf…
    http://www.responsibletechnology.org/article-gmo-soy-linked-to-sterility
    http://www.responsibletechnology.org/docs/140.pdf
    http://www.biointegrity.org/list.htm
    http://www.responsibletechnology.org/docs/140.pdf
    http://www.nongmoproject.org/learn-more/
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/10/02/vicky-debold-on-gmo-vaccines.aspx
    http://www.ogtr.gov.au
    http://www.who.int/immunization/sage…
    http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/qa_flublok-vaccine.htm
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21835220
    http://www.naturalnews.com/039013_flu_vaccine_insect_virus_gmos.html
    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs107/en/
    ************************************************************************
    The benefits of Lugol’s Iodine for the body
    Orthomolecular research is focused on preventing and treating disease by determining how much of a certain natural substance the body needs and then determining the best way to provide it. Lugol’s Iodine (LI) is a substance that can be of tremendous benefit to us when we ensure that we have the right amount in our bodies. We can suffer from a wide range of illnesses simply because our bodies are deficient in this miraculous iodine.
    Here are some of the benefits of Lugol’s Iodine for the body:
    Essential for proper thyroid health.
    Useful anti-oxidant.
    Efficient anti-pathogen-kills most forms of bacteria, viruses and fungi quickly.
    Effectively works to reverse hypo- and hyperthyroid conditions.
    Has anti-biofilm surfactant properties.
    Acts as an anti-histamine at larger dosages.
    Detoxes cadmium, aluminum, lead, mercury, arsenic and other poisons.
    Detoxes fluorine and bromine.
    Helps to balance the body’s hormone system.
    Essential for all hormone receptor activity and health (not just the thyroid gland).
    Raises metabolism, making it more efficient.
    Essential for proper immune system health.
    Essential immune system component of mucus glands throughout the body.
    Essential for bone health.
    Promotes skin, hair and nail health.
    Promotes healthy digestion.
    Reduces excessive mucus production.
    Helps properly regulate estrogen in the ovaries.
    Decreases insulin needs/helps diabetes.
    Iodine has mucolytic action (clears excess mucus in the lungs, nose etc.).
    Increases energy (increases ATP production).
    Essential for early brain development.
    Lowers cholesterol and reduces arterial plaque build-up.
    Radiation protection.
    Please note that many of the above benefits from supplementing Lugol’s Iodine have nothing whatsoever to do with the thyroid gland. Our thyroid gland is not the only part of our body that needs iodine. We should also ask: What other diseases and problems can (and will) arise if there is insufficient iodine/iodide for our brain, stomach, intestines, ears, hormone receptors, breasts, eyes, skin, uterus, prostate, salivary glands, lungs and immune system These are all iodine user/storage sites
    *************************************************************************
    Why should we supplement Lugol’s Iodine Why not just supplement Potassium Iodide(I-) or Nascent Iodine(I3-) instead
    The reason why Lugol’s Iodine is perhaps a better supplement is because it has all three forms of beneficial elemental iodine — Lugol’s Iodine contains molecular Iodine(I2), Iodide(I-) and Tri-iodide (I3-) according to this equilibrium reaction in solution:
    I2 + I- I3-
    Furthermore, when used on its own, Nascent Iodine (I3-) is not a heavy metal chelator. Lugol’s Iodine is a heavy metal chelator and remover (due to the iodide content), removing mercury, lead, cadmium, aluminum and arsenic from the body’s cells. Similarly, the Iodide form is only absorbed by the thyroid gland, skin and salivary glands, whereas the elemental iodine storage sites in the breasts, prostate and intestines can only absorb the molecular iodine form (I2). Furthermore, many other iodine storage sites need elemental iodine – such as the brain, stomach and salivary glands – and these sites need higher dosages in order to be absorbed in sufficient and proper amounts.—So the reason I use and prefer orthomolecular dosages of Lugol’s Iodine (2 to 8 drops or 12.5mgs to 50 mgs of 5% Lugol’s Iodine per day for maintenance) is because of LI’s huge all-round benefit for the whole body – not just for the benefit of the thyroid gland.
    ***********************************************************************
    Companion Supplements For LI— * Selenium is required for proper glutathione peroxidase levels in the thyroid gland. If these levels are too low, then hydrogen peroxide waste builds up to dangerous levels within the thyroid cells, which eventually tend to corrupt the host Thyroglubulin protein and changes it into a foreign protein that the immune system regards as “The Enemy”. Hence the anti-bodies attack the thyroid cell, causing nodule formation..
    * Selenium, as glutathione, as well as Zinc are also essential for the conversion of T4(thyroxin) to the more active form of T3 (triiodothyronin) within the thyroid gland. This helps to maintain more appropriate levels of T3(the more active thyroid hormone). Zinc is also required to maintain healthy thyroid receptors throughout the body. Zinc also stimulates the immune system.
    * Both mercury and fluoride, whenever they are in excess in the body, cause significant damage to both the hypothalamus(in the brain) and the pituitary gland. Iodine is essential to displace and remove excess fluoride from the body and both iodine and selenium are needed to remove mercury. Build up of mercury or fluoride in these glands will cause corrupt mis-regulation of the TRH(Thyroid Releasing Hormone) and TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone) which is also bound to adversely affect the production of thyroid hormones in the body.
    * Vitamin C is necessary to help clear the NIS (Sodium-Iodide Symporters) of bromine corruption. When bromine is absorbed by the NIS network, iodine absorption is strongly inhibited and impeded. Vitamin C acts to quickly clear bromine from the intestinal and cellular NIS pathways to allow the proper uninhibited absorption of iodine throughout the body.
    * Magnesium (as well as tyrosine, an amino acid) are needed to convert the iodide in the blood so it can be stored in the thyroid gland as iodine. Lack of proper daily amounts of magnesium in the body will therefore greatly contribute to low thyroid or hypothyroid conditions. Most people lack proper amounts of magnesium in their diets today.
    * Niacin and the B Vitamins. Higher dose niacin is required to stimulate energy production in the body. Niacin acts to lift depression and also helps to thin the blood safely. From recent research it was found that niacin/niacinamide increased immune system strength by a factor of 2000. Supplementing the full range of B vitamins also acts synergistically to increase the beneficial effects of niacin.
    * The Sea Salt Loading Protocol may also be needed to more quickly remove excess bromine from the body and from the blood. Bromine tends to inhibit iodine absorption as well as cause many side-effects and symptoms. See References below for more details.